11-15-2015, 03:25 PM
11-15-2015, 08:39 PM
A lovely story , good karma.
The guy who had his money returned was very ungrateful giving the boy $100 , that wouldn't even buy him a pattie.
Glad the finance organisation are supporting him with his future.
Sadly not surprised that he was belittled for handing the money in.
The guy who had his money returned was very ungrateful giving the boy $100 , that wouldn't even buy him a pattie.
Glad the finance organisation are supporting him with his future.
Sadly not surprised that he was belittled for handing the money in.
11-15-2015, 08:41 PM
good story, and yes , doing the right thing , should be acknowledged !
11-16-2015, 08:35 AM
The owner of the money was ungrateful!
11-16-2015, 08:51 AM
(11-15-2015, 08:39 PM)Westenders Wrote: [ -> ]A lovely story , good karma.
The guy who had his money returned was very ungrateful giving the boy $100 , that wouldn't even buy him a pattie.
Glad the finance organisation are supporting him with his future.
Sadly not surprised that he was belittled for handing the money in.
Its said that the man that gave the $100 reward was a messenger.....the money that was lost was not his and he really didn't have/could not afford to give more.
11-16-2015, 11:01 AM
Hi raine
I re- read the article above and could not find any mention of the man who lost the money being a messenger, did you read another article which said this?
I re- read the article above and could not find any mention of the man who lost the money being a messenger, did you read another article which said this?
11-16-2015, 11:52 AM
It said the owners name and ID and pic were in the bag .Should have "hit him " up a little more .
11-16-2015, 01:02 PM
I read in the comments on the article that the owner "MAY" have been a messenger.
I haven't seen any source verifying that, but agree with the general sentiment that I don't know the owner's situation and, therefore, shouldn't be too quick to judge the action of giving "only $100JA" (which I admit was my initial reaction).
I haven't seen any source verifying that, but agree with the general sentiment that I don't know the owner's situation and, therefore, shouldn't be too quick to judge the action of giving "only $100JA" (which I admit was my initial reaction).